The pyramids or the Valley of the Kings? What this site can and cannot compare

Why there is no comparison table on this page

A two-column table with the pyramids on one side would be the easiest thing on this site to write and the least defensible. Every figure on these pages was checked against the Ministry, against the Theban Mapping Project and Wikipedia’s tomb articles, or against several independent 2026 guides. Nothing about Giza went through that process. Rather than fill the column from memory and dress it as research, this page leaves it empty and says so.

That is not evasion. It is the same standard that keeps a taxi fare and an in-tomb temperature off the rest of the site. If a number here is worth trusting, it is because numbers that were not checked did not get printed.

What the Valley of the Kings actually is, concretely

It is on the West Bank at Luxor; the town is on the East Bank, and you cross by ferry or by the road bridge to the south. The tombs are cut into the rock and entered by descending. Sizes and character vary far more than the phrase “a tomb” suggests:

• KV11, Ramses III — 188 m long, painted with two blind harpers, and its axis shifts partway along because the ancient excavators broke into the earlier KV10.
• KV8, Merenptah — a 160 m corridor. The king lay inside four nested stone sarcophagi; the third went to Tanis, and a granite lid still rests in the burial chamber on a modern limestone base.
• KV6, Ramses IX — 105 m, and open since antiquity, with Roman and Coptic graffiti on its walls.
• KV16, Ramses I — only 29 m, with two descending staircases, Book of Gates decoration and a red quartzite sarcophagus still in place. Giovanni Belzoni found it in October 1817.
• KV17, Seti I — 137.19 m, seven corridors, ten chambers, painted raised relief, and a vaulted ceiling of golden stars on deep blue.

So the honest characterisation is: an interior, downhill, close-up activity where the reward is decoration and inscription at arm’s length. Whatever else you are choosing between, that is the thing on this side of the choice.

The one comparison the sources do support

These tombs were being visited by tourists long before anyone wrote a comparison post about them. KV9 carries roughly 995 ancient visitor inscriptions dated between the 1st century BC and the 4th century AD. KV2 carries 656 individual ancient graffiti from Greek and Roman visitors and about fifty Coptic ones, and an ancient plan of that tomb survives on papyrus in Turin at 1:28 scale. KV6 has never closed since antiquity. The valley has been a visitor destination for something over two thousand years, and the walls record the visitors as well as the kings. That is a sourced fact, and it is more interesting than any ranking.

Two things people conflate, which this site can settle

Nefertari is not here. Her tomb is in the Valley of the Queens, roughly 2 km away, on a different ticket — that site’s own entry is EGP 220 and her tomb is published at EGP 2,500 on top. No Valley of the Kings ticket of any price admits you to it, and whether it is open at all is unconfirmed. The full correction is here.

Tutankhamun is here. KV62 is in this valley, and he is still in it. The ticket is EGP 700 on top of general entry and it does not consume one of your three tombs. The Tutankhamun page takes the question apart properly.

If you are choosing on cost and time

Entry is EGP 750 for a foreign adult and admits you to three tombs of your choice from the eight to ten usually open; EGP 375 for a foreign student. Three tombs at a comfortable pace is about two hours, three to four with the paid tombs added. The site is open 6:00 AM to 5:00 PM daily. Luxor’s mean daily maximum is 41.4 °C in July. Take those four figures to whatever you are comparing against and do the sum yourself — the ticket detail is on the price grid, the included-tombs rule on the three-tomb page, and the clock on how much time you need.

Frequently asked questions